Home > Cars, Truck Trial > Land Rover series 2

Land Rover series 2

September 6th, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

My final 2010 Truck Trial vehicle, built in less than single week after the previous vehicle failed. Features full pendular suspension, 4×4 drive, lights and opening doors, bonnet and rear board.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 03/09/2010
Power: electric (Power Functions)
Dimensions: length 48 studs / width 26 studs / height 27 studs
Weight: 1.985 kg (1.726 kg in roofless version)
Suspension: pendular, stabilized with shock absorbers
Propulsion: 1 x PF XL motor geared down 5:1
Top speed: 0.8 kmph in roofless version
Motors: 1 x PF XL, 1 x PF Medium

When I decided to abandon my Fiat SPA35 model, it was just a week before the Truck Trial race and my first decision was to pass on driving this time and to only take care of filming. Shortly after, I changed my mind and decided to try some simple 4×4 vehicle, just to drive something in the race. The vehicle was intended to combine the advantages of my two previous Truck Trial vehicles – Hummer H1 and Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, while also learning from Fiat’s failure. I wanted to try to model another famous 4×4 vehicle, so the classic Land Rover series 2 (dating all the way back to 1958) was pretty much an obvious choice.

While the complete model appears much like a Hummer/Wrangled hybrid on the outside, it was internally much closer to the Fiat model. The chassis was built completely with studless parts and used large Technic turntables to hold suspension modules in place – both solutions tested in the Fiat for the first time. The Land Rover shared engine location, gear ratio and wheels with the Wrangler and a studfull body with the Hummer. In fact, the Rover used studfull body around a studless chassis, whereas Wrangler used studless body around a studfull chassis.

The suspension has undergone some major changes in comparison to the version used in Fiat. The front axle was reverted to the version used in the Wrangler, and then a single turntable was attached behind it and the steering system was additionally reinforced. Both drive and steering were transferred through the turntable – steering by a solid driveshaft and steering by am empty differential sitting on it. The rear axle was built from a scratch between two turntables. There was no gearbox, and – just like in the Wrangler – the drive motor was located above the front axle, right under the bonnet. The racing rules we use state that every model has to be equipped with a piston engine of accurate configuration and placement, unless the actual drive motor is located where the original engine is. Thus, locating the motor under the bonnet meant that no piston engine was needed in the model, which saved space, weight and drive motor’s power. The steering was controlled by a single PF Medium motor geared down 15:1 and located low in the chassis, in front of the rear axle. The entire underside of the chassis was covered with studless parts, in order to create a single smooth surface that was unlikely to get  stuck on an obstacle, and in order to lower the centre of gravity as well.

Knowing that my Wrangler model had abundance of torque, I wanted the Rover to be much heavier.  Our racing rules take power-to-weight ratio of each individual model into account, therefore more weight at the same power means more points. Thus, I wanted the body to be massive, but at the same time it was my goal to keep the model’s centre of gravity low, despite its significant ground clearance (up to 7 studs under cabin’s floor). Therefore especially the lower portion of the body was built so densely that model came out almost undamaged from some crash tests I conducted later.

The body was equipped with a pair of opening doors, an opening bonnet with a spare wheel fixed on top of it (a common sight in early Land Rover versions), and opening rear board with the IR receiver attached to it. Most of the Land Rovers can be accessed from the back by a single door, and a board is a rarity. I chose the board over door because this way the IR receiver was more exposed, and could be pulled out from the cabin’s inside to some extend if needed. Moreover, the rear part of the cabin has been adapted to house a camera. Due to weak mounting points, this solution worked well only on flat, level surfaces, as proven during the race.

It should be noted that the model’s body was inaccurate: the front radiator grille should be put further back under the bonnet. I couldn’t model it because of the frame that braces the suspension module of the front axle. Moreover, inspired by the Inception movie featuring a tracked Hummer H1, I have created a simple set of four tracks for the Land Rover. The tracks and wheels could be easily swapped in the chassis, and while I did not intend to use the tracks outdoors (our racing rules don’t allow tracked vehicles of any kind), I have used these to drive around my apartment. The general performance was apparently inferior with tracks on, and in particular the traction was much worse than it was with wheels.

The completed model weighed a whopping 2.1 kg until I removed ballasted bricks that were mounted under the bonnet in order to shift the centre of gravity forward. It reduced model’s weight to just below 2 kg, and I decided to leave it like that because there was no time left for changes. The model performed well at this weight, it experienced no mechanical failures and displayed superb traction, but it was obvious that it will be struggling against its own weight.

Land Rover was warmly welcomed by other contestants because of its look and its very short building time. It performed well in the race, no mechanical failures occurred, but its weight turned out to be a real problem. The model ran out of power to climb on several occasions, and toppled over once. It ended up at the last place in the race, much to my disappointment. Yet still, other drivers and viewers were greatly impressed by its look, which led me to believe that it would be a waste to take it apart, and that the model should enter our last 2010 race on October, with open body design that should significantly reduce its weight.

Photos:

1.jpg dsc06416.jpg dsc06419.jpg dsc06422.jpg dsc06423.jpg dsc06425.jpg dsc06428.jpg dsc06433.jpg dsc06434.jpg dsc06435.jpg dsc06436.jpg dsc06437.jpg dsc06442.jpg dsc06445.jpg dsc06447.jpg dsc06448.jpg dsc06452.jpg dsc06453.jpg dsc06454.jpg dsc06455.jpg dsc06456.jpg dsc06457.jpg dsc06458.jpg dsc06459.jpg dsc06460.png dsc06461.jpg dsc06462.jpg

Work In Progress photos:

1.jpg 2.jpg 3.jpg 4.jpg

Video:

YouTube Preview Image

Media reference:

GadgetSin

Categories: Cars, Truck Trial Tags: , ,
  1. Ben
    May 13th, 2012 at 18:22 | #1

    @Sariel
    i will ;)

  2. Sariel
    May 13th, 2012 at 14:43 | #2

    @Ben
    Thank you. Have fun.

  3. Ben
    May 13th, 2012 at 13:54 | #3

    @Sariel
    parts just arrived a couple of days ago so i built the rest of the chassis and it is AMAZING!!
    thanks for making the instructions it is really apreciated ;)

  4. Sariel
    April 29th, 2012 at 16:33 | #4

    @Ben
    The best idea would be to buy the missing pieces, for example at Bricklink.

  5. Ben
    April 29th, 2012 at 16:19 | #5

    Hi Sariel,
    i have just finished building the rear drive axle of this car and i am really impressed with it.
    i was planning on building the front of it aswell but i cent because i only have 4 of the 2905 peice and i cannot find any other way of building front wheel drive.

    any websites i could look at or ideas?
    Ben

  6. April 23rd, 2012 at 18:20 | #6

    very good struture although fist time trying it the thing broke not best pleasd

  7. Sariel
    April 5th, 2012 at 18:41 | #7

    @woody
    2. Because I don’t want to.
    3. Yes, I’m from Poland. Hence the “.pl” in this website’s address, you know.

  8. April 5th, 2012 at 18:07 | #8

    1.nice!
    2.why you don`t make instruction for body?
    3.are you from poland?

  9. Sariel
    March 27th, 2012 at 17:58 | #9
  10. Rochan
    March 27th, 2012 at 17:36 | #10

    I wanted to know whether you could give me the dimensions of the Basic Land Rover chassis

  11. Sariel
    February 25th, 2012 at 21:05 | #11

    @master2708
    With all due respect, driving on a carpet has nothing to do with off-road performance. Nothing – not even remotely close. Trust me – been there, done that.

  12. master2708
    February 25th, 2012 at 17:27 | #12

  13. Sariel
    February 25th, 2012 at 14:31 | #13

    @master2708
    I’m not offended, I simply know what differentials do to the off-road performance. They simply kill it. Try and you will see.

  14. master2708
    February 25th, 2012 at 14:29 | #14

    @Sariel
    I strongly disagree. Anyway, I didn’t mean to offend you, cause I sincerely admire your work and maybe I’ve exaggerated a little bit my disappointment.

    Keep building ;)

  15. Sariel
    February 25th, 2012 at 09:51 | #15

    @master2708
    To tell you the truth, my rack stays in place, I never glued a thing. And crappy turning without differentials is still way better than getting stuck on every possible obstacle with differentials.

  16. master2708
    February 24th, 2012 at 23:57 | #16

    I have to say that it’s a pretty curious construction, but it has several drawbacks. First of all, because it has no differentials, the turning is crappy as hell. This in turn causes the gear rack change its place, unless glued. What is more, the suspension idea is also hopeless. Therefore, to tell you the truth, I expected something more and I must say, that I’m really disappointed. The only satisfaction I got, was the fact, that I managed to combine this chassis with your 2-speed heavy duty linear gearbox (although controlled manually) and it was fantastic experience for me.

    Best regards master2708

  17. Sariel
    February 19th, 2012 at 20:02 | #17
  18. chris henningsen
    February 19th, 2012 at 19:58 | #18

    hej kan i vise meg om en video vån man byker Land Rover series 2

  19. Sariel
    December 29th, 2011 at 09:04 | #19

    @Ozzman
    No. You will have to be creative with the body.

  20. Ozzman
    December 29th, 2011 at 00:59 | #20

    Hi Sariel

    Do you not have the rest of the Land Rover S2 instructions?

    I can only find the chassis.

  21. Marco
    November 24th, 2011 at 18:44 | #21

    Fantastic!

  22. Sariel
    August 1st, 2011 at 10:09 | #22

    @Felix
    Check the Downloads section, the instruction is already there.

  23. Felix
    August 1st, 2011 at 09:53 | #23

    Hi Sariel

    can you publish the instructions for Land Rover series 2 please?

    thanks Felix

  24. Sariel
    July 31st, 2011 at 21:59 | #24

    @Felix
    English please.

  25. Felix
    July 31st, 2011 at 21:54 | #25

    Hallo Sariel,

    kanst du mal bitte eine Anleitung für den Land Rover Serie 2 reinstellen?
    Würde mich sehr freuen.

    thx Felix

  26. Michał
    June 27th, 2011 at 14:08 | #26

    stokrotne dzięki
    ;]

  27. Sariel
    June 27th, 2011 at 14:01 | #27

    @Michał
    Myślę że w przedziale 500-1000 zł. Gdybyś dobrze poszukał i kupił tylko używane części, myślę że mógłbyś zejść poniżej 500.

  28. Michał
    June 27th, 2011 at 13:58 | #28

    Ile kasy mniej więcej kosztowało Cię jego zrobienie?

  29. Duncan Mills
    June 27th, 2011 at 04:39 | #29

    @Cars2cool Interested! im in AZ however….

  30. Sariel
    May 18th, 2011 at 22:18 | #30

    @Mike Doiron
    No, I don’t sell anything.

  31. May 18th, 2011 at 21:41 | #31

    Ser “2″ that should have indicated… thanks

  32. May 18th, 2011 at 21:40 | #32

    This Ser @ is great, are any “kits” created for sale btw ?

    mike

  33. Cars2cool
    April 19th, 2011 at 17:55 | #33

    oh, ok. I see, thanks anyway

  34. Sariel
    April 18th, 2011 at 22:29 | #34

    @Cars2cool
    It’a hard for me to help you, honestly, because I do none of the things you’ve mentioned. Here, we simply have a single person who organizes the whole thing and acts as a judge for the race, sets up the course and calls dates and places to meet.

Comment pages
1 2 3 1541
  1. No trackbacks yet.