CAUTION: the models featured at this website are not available for sale anywhere. If you see a website claiming to sell models that look like these, it's a scam and they'll just steal your money. Some websites, such as Detail-useful.com are using photos stolen from my website to make it look like they have these models for sale while in reality they don't, they are not associated with me, they're just scammers.
Home > Walkers > Walking Mini Cooper

Walking Mini Cooper

January 19th, 2015 Leave a comment Go to comments

My second modification of an official LEGO set – the LEGO 10242 Mini Cooper walking on eight legs.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 18/01/2015
Power: electric (Power Functions)
Dimensions: length 35 studs / width 20 studs / height 25 studs
Weight: 1.064 kg
Suspension: none
Propulsion: 2 x PF L motor geared 8:1
Motors: 2 x PF L motor

After I have equipped the body of the Lego 10242 set with tracks, I removed the tracks and chassis but kept the body intact. For a while I was wondering what else I can do with it before I strip it down once and for all. At some point I got curious if my old simple walking mechanism could carry it, and how stable it would be.

Building this model was fairly easy: I took the mechanics from my Octopod walker, strengthened and slightly widened its torso, and reworked legs to make them spaced closed together and thus fitting under 10242’s body, and to make them operate at angles better suited for carrying weight. The 8878 PF battery ended up inside the trunk, and SBrick was installed behind driver’s seat. I also kept the front Lego LEDs that were there since my previous 10242 modification.

In the end, the model proved to perform way beyond my expectations. The modified legs made it extremely stable – there was some bobbing up/down involved, but no sideways movement under any conditions – whether going straight, making a turn, or turning around in place. Thanks to the reinforced torso and to the use of PF L motors, it was also able to move at similar speed as my original Octopod, despite being more than twice as heavy. The SBrick performed fine and allowed fine control over the walking direction, as I was able to precisely control speed of each of the two motors.

It was a very funny model to watch and to play with, and it demonstrated how much performance of a walking mechanism is affected by the geometry of its legs. Just a few changes made it much more stable than the initial version, and capable of carrying impressive load. I only wish I could make a really fast walker, but given the complex forces acting on its legs and torso, this seems unlikely to achieve with Lego pieces.

Photos:

1.jpg dsc03305.jpg dsc03315.jpg dsc03325.jpg dsc03337.jpg dsc03361.jpg dsc03366.jpg dsc03377.jpg dsc03385.jpg dsc03389.jpg

Video:

Media coverage

The Lego Car Blog

Categories: Walkers Tags: , , , ,
  1. EV3fan
    January 23rd, 2015 at 20:16 | #1

    I mean the legs lift up, move forward, go down, move forward, move up again etc. The Idea is that there’s only an up/down movement when the legs aren’t carrying weight and moving forward and they go straight when being moved backward. In your mechanism the legs push the walker’s body up and down when they are on the ground, because you use an eccenter mechanism for the up/down movement. And walkers can also work without flexible links, of course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p9eVy9kv8E

  2. Sariel
    January 23rd, 2015 at 19:46 | #2

    @EV3fan
    If they don’t go up and down, how is your mechanism going to move? You know, the legs have to go forward, then backward. If they don’t go up and down, it means they touch the floor when going forward and when going backward. And as for reinforcing – the piece you want to use is quite easy to rip out. The essential problem is that the more you reinforce a walking mechanism, the bigger and heavier it’s going to be, requiring reinforcing even more.

  3. EV3fan
    January 23rd, 2015 at 19:13 | #3

    If I would build a fast walker ( I may will when my car is done ) I would use a different walking mechanism where the legs go in a straight line and dont move up and down, anyway.

  4. EV3fan
    January 23rd, 2015 at 19:10 | #4

    Yes, that’s right, but do I have to use them at all? I think in this case the link – and towball system can be replaced with these parts http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemPic.asp?P=32013&tab=I sitting vertically on cross axle/Pin hole connectors without friction so they can rotate and being connected with the other hole to a technic beam acting as the link. This system would provide two connection points with two degrees of freedom, and could be heavily reinforced if needed. 🙂

  5. Sariel
    January 23rd, 2015 at 15:16 | #5

    @EV3fan
    And how are you going to reinforce links and towballs they sit on? That’s the weak link.

  6. EV3fan
    January 23rd, 2015 at 15:02 | #6

    You said you thought a fast walker was not possible with lego because of al the forces but why? I mean if one built a walker with a three- dimensional hull instead of two thin beams as chassis and reinforced the legs against all forces acting it might be possible to make a faster one. A kind of suspension to soften the up and down movement would maybe help, too. Just a thought.

  7. Sariel
    January 21st, 2015 at 00:54 | #7

    @Exobotics
    No idea. I haven’t tested it on sloped surfaces.

  8. January 20th, 2015 at 22:43 | #8

    @Sariel
    I see. Was the traction adequate even on sloped surfaces?

  9. Sariel
    January 20th, 2015 at 10:22 | #9

    @Exobotics
    Yes. This walker is much heavier, so it has better traction on plastic legs. At the same time, rubber tips would bend under pressure, generating plenty of friction for the motors to overcome.

  10. January 20th, 2015 at 04:48 | #10

    Very cool modification; I’ve always been a big fan of walkers! However, I noticed that, unlike your original Octopod, you didn’t use rubber tips on the Mini’s legs. Was there any particular reason for this?

  11. EV3fan
    January 19th, 2015 at 16:29 | #11

    Awesome !! 🙂 🙂 🙂

  12. Sariel
    January 19th, 2015 at 11:43 | #12

    @forge
    I tried that, they would tear the mechanism apart. The problem is that a walking chassis has much more structural stress to handle than a wheeled one.

  13. forge
    January 19th, 2015 at 07:24 | #13

    What would happen if you replaced the l motors with rc motors? just an idea and great work!

  14. Maras
    January 19th, 2015 at 06:48 | #14

    Brilliant!

  1. No trackbacks yet.