Model of a Liebherr excavator with tunneling arm. Features a blend of electric and pneumatic functions, custom stickers and lights.  

Datasheet:

Completion date: 17/06/2011
Power: electric (Power Functions) / pneumatic (external manual pump)
Dimensions (with arm in driving position): length 40 studs / width 16 studs / height 35 studs
Weight: 1.497 kg
Suspension: none
Propulsion: 2 x PF Medium geared 1:1
Motors: 4 x PF Medium, 1 x 71427

Model of a regular Liebherr excavator with an uncommon tunneling arm. Model of the very same machine created in larger scale was released in 2010 by my fellow LUGPol member M_longer and is available here. M_longer introduced me to this excavator before he started to build it, and I liked it so much that I intended to build it first. Eventually my timing kind of failed, because my model was finished 10 months after his

My version of the excavator was intended to be much smaller than M_longer’s: his was scaled to the new tread system, and I decided to use the old one for mine. The resulting difference in scale means that my model is roughly 40% smaller. Seeing that the model would be quite small for its number of functions, I have been planning to use pneumatics wherever possible and to have an external pneumatic controller permanently attached to the model. This solution is sometimes called a ‘pneumatic leash’ and it was used in many of the models created by my idol builder, Jennifer Clark. I have never really used it before and I thought of this as of opportunity to feel like Jennifer

While I was in the process of cramming the mechanics inside the hull, it occurred to me that I will be able to integrate all four pneumatic valves into the hull at the cost of making its upper surface uglier. I decided it was worth it, and eventually the model’s only external element was a single manual pump, which allowed for more accurate control of the pneumatic system than a motorized compressor would.

As for the aesthetic side, I didn’t want the hull to look like a box, which was pointed out with my earlier Caterpillar excavator, so I decided to build the sides and the back of the hull using body panels and SNOT (studs not on top) technique. I think the model looked generally worse than M_longer’s version, which is disadvantage of the smaller scale, but it did include a number of details that were omitted by M_longer in his model – such as e.g. the side and rear view mirrors.

The model had 5 motorized and 4 pneumatic functions. The propulsion system was obviously motorized and consisted of two PF Medium motors geared 1:1 and located in the chassis. The chassis also housed a third PF Medium motor, which rotated the superstructure. The fourth PF Medium motor was located inside the superstructure and drove two large linear actuators that controlled the elevation of the arm’s first section. As the actuators were effectively handling the weight of the entire massive arm, I have assumed that pneumatic cylinders would be too weak or too inaccurate for this task. Finally, there was a  71427 motor located at the back of the hull, and it was chosen because it’s shorter than a PF Medium motor. Its function was driving the milling head, which was done by a single long driveshaft that went all the way from the back of the hull to the tip of the arm and which was articulated in five places.

The 71427 motor was not controlled remotely, like the other four motors, but was instead connected to a switch located in the front right part of the hull. The same switch controlled two lights on the arm, as there was simply not enough space inside the hull to connect them together with hull’s front and rear lights. As a result, the lights on the arm lit up as the milling head works.

The whole electric system was powered from a single 8878 rechargeable battery located in the rear left part of the hull. The battery was accessible through a hatch in the left side of the hull, and was lying on its side in order to stay aligned with the side body panel.

The pneumatic system consisted of a single large cylinder that controlled elevation of the dozer blade in front of the chassis, two small cylinders that tilted the arm’s second section left and right, two large cylinders that controlled elevation of the arm’s third section and a single large cylinder that controlled the angle of the arm’s head. The arm itself was a fully studless structure partially covered by a studfull shell. Its range of movement was reasonably close to that of the original machine, and it was robust enough to support the model on one side. The milling head could be easily removed and replaced by e.g. a bucket or… something else.

It should be noted that the model’s driving speed and superstructure’s rotation speed were both inflated. I have done this on purpose, because I wanted to use the full potential of the model’s motors, knowing that I can reduce the abundant speed at any moment using the speed dial remote.

I was fairly satisfied with this model. It was compact yet full of various functions, it blended motors, linear actuators and pneumatics using the advantages of  each, and it looked quite good and accurate. Despite having no gear reduction at all, it was perfectly able to push and tow the 8110 Unimog set which weights over 2 kg. I consider it a noticeable step forward from my previous excavators in terms of blending aesthetics and functionality, and – unlike my previous excavators – it appeared free from severe disadvantages to me.

Photos:

Video:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Media reference:

TechnicBRICKs

Share/Bookmark

Large model of a Caterpillar front shovel excavator designed for a public display. Features a drivetrain with a subtractor, superstructure rotation mechanism, V12 piston engine, arm with 3 joints controlled remotely by motorized linear actuators, pneumatically opened bucket, remotely elevated operator’s cabin, lights and custom stickers.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 11/06/2010
Power: electric (Power Functions) / pneumatic (fed from internal compressor)
Dimensions (with the arm in ‘resting’ position): length 80 studs / width 28 studs / height 35 studs
Weight: 3.5 kg
Suspension: pendular bogies
Propulsion: PF XL motor geared down 9:1, through a subtractor
Motors: 2 x PF XL, 6 x PF Medium, 1 x 71427

I wanted to build a front shovel excavator controlled by linear actuators for some time already. It took me a while to find a machine with a distinctive silhouette (as many large front shovel excavators are shaped similarly) and my choice was the Caterpillar 90-tonne machine with an unusual cabin elevation system.

The model would be built at much later time if it wasn’t for the people from the Focus popular science magazine, who invited me over to a Picnic of Science held in Warsaw (the largest popular science event in whole Europe). It was a kind invitation, but it also meant a fixed term to build something spectacular and, so to say, public-proof. I had to hurry to make it on time, I even used my absence of leave to finish the model, but I felt it was still not tested sufficiently.

The look of the model is accurate to some degree. The size and all the dimensions are kept faithful, and the colour theme is an exact rendition of one of the two Caterpillar liveries I’ve seen this machine with. The details on the top of the model, however, were intended to look diverse rather than accurate, the V12 piston engine model is completely unrealistic (but it turned out to be a great crowd pleaser, as anticipated), and the arm lacks a single actuator. Additionally, the way the bucket opens up has been changed slightly to make the bucket look better and be more structurally sound.

As for the functional side, it was largely affected by the unexpectedly huge weight of the model. While the chassis was providently built around a really massive studless frame, the drivetrain had to be additionally geared down to handle it. Even with the 9:1 gear reduction, some gears in the subtractor are still being grinded to dust. Not a single gear in the drivetrain was broken, but there was a plastic dust coming out whenever I opened up the subtractor. But in fact, the painfully low speed of the model is accurate as the real machine moves at 4.4 kmph.

There is a studless Technic turntable between the chassis and the superstructure. The stability is provided by four double rollers, consisting of two wedge belt wheels with rubber tires each, and integrated into the superstructure’s bearing frame (located, as usual, in its ‘floor’). The rollers are supported by large tiles on the top of the chassis. I have assumed that use of large rollers will be a convenient way of filling the gap between the superstructure and the chassis, and that the rubber tires will provide a degree of elasticity should the superstructure tilt while operating. Whether these assumptions were accurate or not is difficult to prove eventually. But I was right to only use four sets of rollers (front/rear/left/right one) as they provided sufficient stability for as long as they were part of a sound, rigid structure.

The major drawback of this model is the use of an 8-teeth gear wheel as the final part of the superstructure rotation mechanism. The weight of the superstructure coupled with the friction generated by the rollers’ rubber tires caused this gear to be severely damaged during final tests. Since it was very difficult to replace (read: it required to take half of the model apart) and there was no guarantee that the new gear wheel wouldn’t share its fate, I left if the way it was. Which means that the superstructure rotation works only when aided by hand. The video clearly shows that superstructure rotates as long as the rear part of the hull is being gently pushed (at some point I even use a single finger for that to demonstrate that there is indeed a mechanism working there and that I’m not simply rotating the superstructure by a hand). The use of the 8-teeth gear wheel, which worked fine in lighter models, was a mistake here to begin with. I should have used a worm gear instead, preferably one that would be mounted to the chassis and driven from the chassis.

The rear part of the hull houses the 8878 rechargeable battery which powers the whole model and which can be accessed by a small sliding lid. On its left, there is a big V12 piston engine driven by a separate PF Medium motor coupled with the drive motor (which means that there is no mechanical connection between this engine and the drivetrain whatsoever). The whole V12 is fully enclosed inside the hull, and can be displayed by opening up a two-piece lid. I always wanted to include a piston engine into an excavator model, and with a model that large I finally did. On the right side of the battery, there are four IR receivers and beneath them, there is a pneumatic autovalve which controls the opening/closing of the bucket.

The front part of the hull houses a massive frame around the arm’s main joint. The arm is 6 studs wide at this point, and there is a driveshaft, two pneumatic hoses and three electric wires going through the joint. On the right side of the arm there is a PF XL motor which drives two linear actuators that lift arm’s first section. There is also a PF switch which controls the lights on the arm, and which can be accessed by the means of a small door in the right side of the hull. On the left side, there is a cabin sitting on a scissor lift mechanism, which is moved by a single linear actuator driven by a 71427 motor located under the piston engine. The elevation range of the cabin is impressive, especially when you realize that the whole scissor lift mechanism is just 3 studs tall. The mechanism has its drawback too – it puts a very high load on the motor, so it has to be additionally geared down (hence the low speed of cabin elevating) and the weight of the cabin has to be kept low (hence the number of details is lower than intended).

The arm consists of two sections. The first one is controlled by the aforementioned PF XL motor which drives two linear actuators integrated into the front part of the superstructure’s frame. The second section is controlled by a PF Medium motor located in the hull, between the arm and the 8878 battery, which drives a single linear actuator integrated directly into the arm’s first section. There is another PF Medium motor inside the first section, which drives another two linear actuators that tilt the bucket. The second section of the arm is pretty much empty. The arm was built in the same way as it was with my previous excavator: it consists of a studless frame with directly attached actuators, and a studfull outer skin which provides extra stiffness but is not necessary for the arm to work. I am not quite pleased with the somewhat weird look of the pneumatic hoses on the arm – I could have enclosed these inside the arm, but I felt that an excavator’s arm ought to have some hoses on it. But due to the complex construction of the arm’s first section, there was no way to arrange the hoses in a more realistic manner.

The arm has some excellent movement range. In fact, it is somewhat better than that of the original machine – to the point at which it is not necessary to open the bucket to unload it, as it can be simply tilted.

As for the bucket opening mechanism, it is very simple and consists of just two small pneumatic cylinders. Some minor part of the load is usually left inside the bucket when it opens, but this is caused by the bucket’s inner shape which results from its internal studless frame rather than by the mechanism itself.

This has doubtlessly seen more practical use than any of my other excavators, as it was operated for a couple of hours straight during a public event. It has also successfully faced the devastating curiosity of little children present at the event, but I won’t describe the details lest I sound like a contraception promoter In fact, the failing superstructure rotation mechanism is the only thing that prevents me from calling it my best working excavator model ever. The model has been also highly acclaimed by LUGPol members – so highly, in fact, that I was genuinely surprised.

Photos:

Work in progress photos:

Video:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Media reference:

Hobby Media (Italian only)

Share/Bookmark

Pneumatic excavator with a full remote control. Features internal compressor, 3-position motorized pneumatic valves, integrated manometer, infinite freedom of superstructure rotation, lights, flashing warning lights, custom stickers and simple suspension.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 09/01/2010
Power: electric (Power Functions) / pneumatic (fed from internal electric compressor)
Dimensions (with arm in the transport position):  length 72 studs / width 27 studs / height 56 studs
Weight: 2.77 kg
Suspension:  pendular bogies
Motors: 7 x PF Medium, 1 x 71427
Pneumatics: three circuits with motorized 3-position valves fed from internal 4-pump compressor; integrated manometer

The idea behind this model was simple: to build a fully pneumatically operated excavator with a full remote control. Such a mixture is unique – there are many pneumatic models of excavators, but nearly all of them are connected to an external controller, which houses all pneumatic valves and usually also the compressor. I thought it would be quite a challenge to make a similar model fully remote-controlled, and I was sure that a pneumatically operated arm would look more realistic that one operated by linear actuators (as demonstrated by my earlier Liebherr R996 excavator model).

I was looking for a classic tracked excavator, and – somewhat tired of Caterpillars and Liebherrs – I turned my interest to the Volvo machines. The EC290C excavator scaled down accordingly to the width of the tracks seemed a most proper vehicle to model.

When you think of a pneumatically operated excavator, it quickly becomes obvious that it needs a possibility to return the valves to the neutral position, or – more simply – to close them. With such a possibility all sections of the arms could be controlled independently (well, almost – they would still affect each other by changing the air pressure in the pneumatic system); without it every section would have to reach its extreme position to let another one operate. Therefore I was looking for a small, simple way of controlling the valves, and what I found was an invention of my fellow LUGPol member, Dmac. It’s a very simple solution, but a tricky one – it depends on the elasticity of specific liftarms in relation to the internal gearing of a PF Medium motor.

I have assumed that with all valves controlled in that manner and fed from an internal compressor whose speed I can control remotely, I will have a full control over the excavator’s movement with a satisfactory degree of accuracy.

The model uses an uncommon chassis. It is held together by a single transverse beam which houses two PF medium motors inside it, along with a reinforcing frame made of liftarms. Thus the beam appears small and almost completely smooth, with the motors completely enclosed. It puts quite an extreme load on the beam’s components, but it results in a realistic look, as the real machine also has a single transverse beam in the chassis, and its drive motors are not visible, housed in the superstructure.

Another important thing is that the original Volvo excavator has its drivetrain fully enclosed within the tracks , with no parts protruding out at all. To model it, I have used two long sections of LEGO Technic chain, each connecting one drive wheel to the motor and remaining within the tracks at all times. The colour of the chains matches the colour of the chassis bearing structure, which makes them almost impossible to spot. Together with the enclosed motors, it has lead some viewers to ask how exactly is the whole model driven.

The construction of the hull may seem simple, but it was challenging. First of all the hull is flat but large, and it sits asymmetrically on the turntable. To keep it structurally solid, a supporting frame was needed – it was built around the turntable and integrated into the hull’s floor, taking 1 stud of its height. To make things more complicated, I have decided to use the newer turntable variant because it matched my needs better, but its width was odd while the hull’s width according to the scale was even. To compensate for this difference, a half-stud wide liftarms were used in the frame to give it an even width. There is an additional structure integrated into the frame right above the turntable, which holds together the base of the arm and the base of the pneumatic cylinders that raise its first section, as well as the motor used to rotate the superstructure. Additionally, the compressor was attached to the frame – firstly to minimize its vibrations and secondly to compensate for its height.

The construction of the rest of the hull is pretty traditional – there is a rechargeable battery at the back, serving as a counterweight, and motorized valves on the sides. The right front part of the hull houses the flashing lights mechanism activated by a lever inside the operator’s cabin, which controls four warning lights: two at the rear end of the hull, one on cabin’s top and one on the arm’s side. The cabin has a full interior, despite the fact that it’s slightly smaller (mainly in length) that its real counterpart.

The arm is relatively narrow – only 4 studs wide. It was built by blending two structures: bearing frame made of liftarms which holds it together, and the outer ‘skin’ made of bricks which makes it stiff and gives it a realistic look. All the mounting points for the pneumatic cylinders are attached to the frame: the cylinders were integrated with the frame right at the beginning, in order to work out their optimal positions. There are three sets of pneumatic cylinders on the arm, two consisting of two cylinders, and one consisting of four. All of them are connected to the pneumatic system inside the hull: a mixture of elastic & rigid hoses is used to connect the pneumatic system to the arm. It should be noted that the sets of two cylinders tend to rotate around their longitudinal axle; to prevent this, they are connected to the arm by two axles that slide through certain points of the arm’s structure as the cylinders extend or retract.

The model worked well, given its strongly experimental construction. It has a number of significant flaws, however, the most important being the compressor which worked too slow. It was discovered only at the end of the building process, when the arm gained more weight that it had when the compressor was initially configured. The use of the manometer has paid off – the tests have shown that the pneumatic system was prone to breach at certain pressure. The turntable was a bit unstable, but it didn’t break – despite the fact that it had no supporting rollers or structure of any kind, and that at least 80% of the model’s weight was located in the superstructure.  There is a point on the video when you can hear the turntable squeaking as the superstructure rotates. The final drawback was the use of the standard bucket – I was planning to have a detachable custom bucket and some add-on devices to replace it with, and I even placed an extra outlet of the Power Functions system in the arm to let some motorized devices be connected and controlled. It turned out, however, that both the bucket and one add-on device I have prepared (a demolition jackhammer) were too heavy for the arm (the custom bucket was almost 5 times heavier that the standard one).

I was satisfied with this model despite its flaws. I had little experience with large pneumatic remote-controlled models before, and this proved to be a good lesson – especially when it comes to configuring the compressor. Usually, pneumatic models of this size use large compressors driven by the RC motors, which can fill the whole airtank in a couple of seconds. I had just four pumps and a compressor running at roughly 100 RPM, and it had to fill a system including over 3.5 meter of elastic hose (not including the rigid sections) and 19 pneumatic T-pieces.  Still, I was glad to have an unique self-contained pneumatic model with a fully wireless control. I liked its look to – the decision to use dark grey where I could theoretically use black as well has definitely paid off.

Photos:

Video:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Media reference:

TechnicBRICKs

Share/Bookmark

Model of one of the largest Liebherr excavators. Features 6 motors with full remote control, chassis driven from the superstructure and infinite freedom of superstructure rotation.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 12/02/2009
Power: electric (Power Functions)
Dimensions:  length 47 studs / width 18 studs / height 27 studs (with arm in transport position)
Weight: 1.52 kg
Suspension: none
Motors: 4 x PF Medium, 2 x  71427

My goal here was to create a fully remote controlled, pneumaticless model of an existing excavator, while keeping it reasonably small. My long-time affection made me to turn to Liebherr excavators, and I have chosen the R996 Litronic model with the undershot arm, due to its hull’s shape and arm’s construction. It was scaled to the size of the 3-studs wide tracks, which also suited the size of the linear actuators quite well.

The priority was to reconcile a realistic drivetrain with an enclosed hull construction. In real excavators the chassis is basically driven by one or many motors located inside the superstructure, thus ensuring the infinite freedom of superstructure rotation. This is possible thanks to a hydraulic system, which can’t be modeled with currently available Lego parts. Therefore, it can be only solved by pneumatic or mechanical means, the latter solution being much more compact and reliable. An iconic example of the mechanical solution is the model of a JCB JS220 excavator by Jennifer Clark. The essential trick is to transmit the drive through the turntable by a vertical axle with a free rotating driving ring on it. The driving ring can be assisted by an extension driving ring to transfer the drive further vertically, and eventually is meshed with the t16 gears used in the gearboxes. Thus we have the vertical axle transmitting drive to one track and the driving ring transmitting drive to the other track independently.

The functioning of this solution is slightly affected by the superstructure’s rotation, as the position of motors in relation to the tracks changes. Usually it results in the tracks being slowly driven by the supestructure’s movement, but this effect can be greatly reduced by the gear reduction below the superstructure. Here, however, the use of 71427 motors plus the gear reduction and the model’s weight resulted in motors being driven by the rotation rather than the tracks. Still, the drivetrain worked flawlessly, which can be clearly seen on the video when the superstructure is rotated clockwise while the chassis turns in place counterclockwise.

The hull’s construction was challenging from the very beginning. About half of its internal space is occupied by a battery box, and additional space is required by the IR receivers along with the wires. This leaves just about 40% or less of the internal space to be taken by the motors. I initially hoped to contain 4 motors inside the hull, but eventually only three fit in. The other three were incorporated directly into the arm, which helped to counterbalance the weight of the battery box and simplified the transmission system inside the arm.

I’ve spent a lot of time working on the geometry of the arm, and in the end it’s range of movement is as close to the real one as possible, while the number and the location of the linear actuators is almost identical to the number and location of the real machine’s hydraulic cylinders. The model turned out to work quite efficiently, it had a good weight distribution (although it could use a little more weight in the rear part), passed all practical tests, and was able to easily support itself on the arm in order to e.g. lift the front part of tracks above the ground. I was satisfied with its performance and considered it one of my most compact constructions ever.

Photos:

>

Video:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Media reference:

DoubleBrick

Share/Bookmark

My first excavator. Features chassis driven by the motors inside the superstructure, three pneumatic circuits with an internal electric compressor, and full freedom of the superstructure rotation.

Datasheet:

Completion date: 14/06/2008
Power: electric (Power Functions) / pneumatic (fed from internal electric compressor)
Dimensions:  length 45 studs / width 19 studs / height 24 studs
Weight: 1.35 kg
Suspension: pendular bogies
Motors: 2 x PF Medium, 2 x PF XL
Pneumatics: three circuits with manual valves and internal electric compressor

From time to time I build something completely ignoring its aesthetical side, only to study some technical issue. Here is a very ugly case of that – an excavator built primarily to test the drivetrain system developed by Jennifer Clark and others, where the chassis is driven by the motors located inside a rotated superstructure. Since there are two motors needed, this is quite a challenge. A solution to that is the use of an ‘empty’ (without internal bevel gears) differential to transfer drive through the superstructure’s turntable. The differential is set on a vertical axle that transfers the drive of one motor, so that it can rotate on that axle freely and is not affected by its rotation. With such a setup, the differential is used to transfer the drive of the other motor, and it can be connected to a driving ring, if there is a need to transfer the drive further vertically. If used properly, this solution offers a full freedom of the superstructure rotation, at the cost of the rotation affecting the drivetrain – since the motors are stopped, the rotation movement drives one tread forwards and the other one backwards. This effect can be greatly limited by using gear reduction in the drivetrain below the turntable. Here, the worm gears were used for reduction, and the effect is barely observable.

This is exactly the type of the drivetrain used in this vehicle. There are two PF XL motors inside the superstructure, and each of them drives one tread. The superstructure is rotated by a PF Medium motor located inside it, and has full freedom of rotation, as there is only an axle and a differential traversing its turntable. Thanks to that, the chassis is very compact; there is axtually just a 7x7x7 studs liftarmic cube below the turntable, and the treads are connected to the sides of it.

The rest of the model is quite simple: there is an internal electric compressor driven by a PF Medium motor, that powers three pneumatic circuits, each with a manual valve. Two of them control the arm, and the third one controls the bucket. This construction has taught me a lot – among others that I can’t build from liftarms as easily and successfully as Nico71 does.

Note: some people ask if the bucket is the wrong way. No, it is not. There are two possible setups of excavator buckets: with the bucket facing backwards or forwards. The latter, which I have used here, is simply much less common, typical for mining excavators rather than for the ones at the construction sites.

Photos:

Video:

Click here to view the embedded video.

Share/Bookmark