<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2-speed Automatic Gearbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/</link>
	<description>Sariel&#039;s custom LEGO Technic creations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-45904</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-45904</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-45871&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@johnboy104 &lt;/a&gt; 
Probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-45871" rel="nofollow">@johnboy104 </a><br />
Probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnboy104</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-45871</link>
		<dc:creator>johnboy104</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-45871</guid>
		<description>What about if your output dosen&#039;t run to 180 rpm, will it be a hard shift then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about if your output dosen&#8217;t run to 180 rpm, will it be a hard shift then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-41828</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-41828</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-41798&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@wyatt &lt;/a&gt; 
Because it&#039;s way too fragile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-41798" rel="nofollow">@wyatt </a><br />
Because it&#8217;s way too fragile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyatt</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-41800</link>
		<dc:creator>wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-41800</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22327&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sariel  &lt;/a&gt; More rubber bands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22327" rel="nofollow">@Sariel  </a> More rubber bands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyatt</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-41798</link>
		<dc:creator>wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-41798</guid>
		<description>why Wont you use this in your trial trucks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why Wont you use this in your trial trucks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepijn de Vos</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-41720</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepijn de Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-41720</guid>
		<description>Ah, nicely done. I tried several of these a while back, and my best one is this: http://wishfulcoding.nl/buildinginstructions/gearbox.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, nicely done. I tried several of these a while back, and my best one is this: <a href="http://wishfulcoding.nl/buildinginstructions/gearbox.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://wishfulcoding.nl/buildinginstructions/gearbox.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-22409</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-22409</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22397&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@neamerjell &lt;/a&gt; 
There is a three-speed design of such a gearbox existing. The problem is, it rarely stays on second gear, and the problem would increase with more speeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22397" rel="nofollow">@neamerjell </a><br />
There is a three-speed design of such a gearbox existing. The problem is, it rarely stays on second gear, and the problem would increase with more speeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neamerjell</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-22397</link>
		<dc:creator>neamerjell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 02:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-22397</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22327&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sariel &lt;/a&gt; 

I figured the transmissions might try to work against each other like that. I wonder how difficult it would be to make an automatic transmission using the same concept as this one, but with more than two speeds. My first guess would be that the resulting size and complexity would make it impractical for use as anything but a proof of concept. Still, it would be a neat thing to try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22327" rel="nofollow">@Sariel </a> </p>
<p>I figured the transmissions might try to work against each other like that. I wonder how difficult it would be to make an automatic transmission using the same concept as this one, but with more than two speeds. My first guess would be that the resulting size and complexity would make it impractical for use as anything but a proof of concept. Still, it would be a neat thing to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-22327</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-22327</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22325&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@neamerjell &lt;/a&gt; 
Yes, bevel gears are way better suited for linear gearboxes. As for coupling two automatic gearboxes, I think it wouldn&#039;t work well because they would keep affecting each other. They are both torque-sensitive and at the same time they manipulate the amount of torque in the drivetrain, so they would interfere with each other and probably keep switching back and forth all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22325" rel="nofollow">@neamerjell </a><br />
Yes, bevel gears are way better suited for linear gearboxes. As for coupling two automatic gearboxes, I think it wouldn&#8217;t work well because they would keep affecting each other. They are both torque-sensitive and at the same time they manipulate the amount of torque in the drivetrain, so they would interfere with each other and probably keep switching back and forth all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neamerjell</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-22325</link>
		<dc:creator>neamerjell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-22325</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen your stuff around Brickshelf.com over the past few years, and I&#039;m completely blown away by the ideas you come up with. 

What do you think would happen if you made a second transmission, with a different ratio, and its input connected to this transmissions output. Would it make a four speed automatic transmission, or would both parts try to shift at the same time when resistance is met?

Also, I&#039;ve noticed when I tried to build linear transmissions with 24, 16, and 8 tooth gears, they end up grinding and binding. Do the bevel gears you used help with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen your stuff around Brickshelf.com over the past few years, and I&#8217;m completely blown away by the ideas you come up with. </p>
<p>What do you think would happen if you made a second transmission, with a different ratio, and its input connected to this transmissions output. Would it make a four speed automatic transmission, or would both parts try to shift at the same time when resistance is met?</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve noticed when I tried to build linear transmissions with 24, 16, and 8 tooth gears, they end up grinding and binding. Do the bevel gears you used help with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-22324</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-22324</guid>
		<description>I successfully built the transmission with the old differential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I successfully built the transmission with the old differential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2009/04/2-speed-automatic-gearbox/comment-page-2/#comment-15428</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=613#comment-15428</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-15423&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ghzz &lt;/a&gt; 
It can be the rubber band, or some pieces are put together too tight. Yes, the gearbox is supposed to work only clockwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-15423" rel="nofollow">@ghzz </a><br />
It can be the rubber band, or some pieces are put together too tight. Yes, the gearbox is supposed to work only clockwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

