<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pneumatic autovalve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/</link>
	<description>Sariel&#039;s custom LEGO Technic creations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-22843</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-22843</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22842&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Phillip &lt;/a&gt; 
You mean you want to provide air from one pump and have several valves? Then all you need to do is to make one compressor and several motorized valves. There&#039;s no need to combine them into one unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22842" rel="nofollow">@Phillip </a><br />
You mean you want to provide air from one pump and have several valves? Then all you need to do is to make one compressor and several motorized valves. There&#8217;s no need to combine them into one unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-22842</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-22842</guid>
		<description>I would like to propose a challenge to you. Would it be possible to operate 2 or more pnuematic autovalves with just one pump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to propose a challenge to you. Would it be possible to operate 2 or more pnuematic autovalves with just one pump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-8626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-8626</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8625&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Gert &lt;/a&gt; 
No, it is not possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8625" rel="nofollow">@Gert </a><br />
No, it is not possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gert</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-8625</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-8625</guid>
		<description>My comment was a question @ sariel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment was a question @ sariel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gert</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-8536</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-8536</guid>
		<description>Is is also possible to pump air with the following item?:

http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?S=5116-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is is also possible to pump air with the following item?:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?S=5116-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?S=5116-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diamondvise</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Diamondvise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Great idea! I&#039;m using it just now in my robotic arm. THX Sariel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! I&#8217;m using it just now in my robotic arm. THX Sariel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 07:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-369</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2236&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jeffrey D&lt;/a&gt;
No, if you adjust gear ratios well the absorbers should be able to push motor back once it stops. I&#039;ve seen someone doing it with a valve, just can&#039;t remember the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2236" rel="nofollow">@Jeffrey D</a><br />
No, if you adjust gear ratios well the absorbers should be able to push motor back once it stops. I&#8217;ve seen someone doing it with a valve, just can&#8217;t remember the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey D</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-370</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2004&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sariel&lt;/a&gt;
If the shocks are enough to overcome the clutch and push the valve closed when the motor is off, then aren&#039;t they also strong enough to just hold it closed while the motor runs? I&#039;ve been working on this all morning and can&#039;t for the life of me find a solution I like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2004" rel="nofollow">@Sariel</a><br />
If the shocks are enough to overcome the clutch and push the valve closed when the motor is off, then aren&#8217;t they also strong enough to just hold it closed while the motor runs? I&#8217;ve been working on this all morning and can&#8217;t for the life of me find a solution I like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-367</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2003&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jeffrey D&lt;/a&gt;
Use a clutch gear and two opposing shock absorbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2003" rel="nofollow">@Jeffrey D</a><br />
Use a clutch gear and two opposing shock absorbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey D</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Me again, been looking around online for a pf controlled valve that automatically resets to the neutral position when the motor is not running.  If you have anything it would be extremely useful, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me again, been looking around online for a pf controlled valve that automatically resets to the neutral position when the motor is not running.  If you have anything it would be extremely useful, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariel</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-365</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1765&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tom&lt;/a&gt;
I think there will be a great chance of knobs getting jammed against each other and against the switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1765" rel="nofollow">@Tom</a><br />
I think there will be a great chance of knobs getting jammed against each other and against the switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://sariel.pl/2008/12/pneumatic-autovalve/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sariel.pl/?p=147#comment-366</guid>
		<description>This is a fantastic invention, well done! I&#039;m planning to use it soon on a model of a Schaffer wheel loader. I have a suggestion that might improve it - instead of using the single cams for pushing the pneumatic switch could you use a cross shaped 4-way cam, maybe the black technic knob wheel - 32072 - http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=32072 ?
I think this would minimise the delay in changing the switch direction as it would push the switch with 4X the frequency. I haven&#039;t tried this yet, but what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fantastic invention, well done! I&#8217;m planning to use it soon on a model of a Schaffer wheel loader. I have a suggestion that might improve it &#8211; instead of using the single cams for pushing the pneumatic switch could you use a cross shaped 4-way cam, maybe the black technic knob wheel &#8211; 32072 &#8211; <a href="http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=32072" rel="nofollow">http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=32072</a> ?<br />
I think this would minimise the delay in changing the switch direction as it would push the switch with 4X the frequency. I haven&#8217;t tried this yet, but what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

